Wii Peripheral

Everyone who has Wii, get one so we can fight with it, lol.

I actually loathe anything mario and zelda so no thanks.

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:I actually loathe anything mario and zelda so no thanks.

Zelda is best, you suck.

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:I actually loathe anything mario and zelda so no thanks.

Zelda is best, you suck.

Oh please. Classic SEGA pwns anything Nintendo can come up with.

Ok, while Sega Genesis was good, Nintendo just beats more tail more epically. I agree with Nelon. Zelda rules.

Besides, last sega gamesystem was Dreamcast in '99. If they were so good, wouldn't they still be making systems?

Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

SEGA is still better

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

SEGA is still better

So, hard proof that Nintendo is superior isn't enough for you to accept it?

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

SEGA is still better

So, hard proof that Nintendo is superior isn't enough for you to accept it?

Its not hard proof. SEGA is underappreciated.

hey guys,
OPINIONS
so it doesn't matter which is better,
its just OPINIONS
i agree with nelon
but its still an opinion

lol
losers

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

SEGA is still better

So, hard proof that Nintendo is superior isn't enough for you to accept it?

Its not hard proof. SEGA is underappreciated.

Nintendo was the best Sega was ok but zelda kills all Sega games so shut up

Useless bickering is useless. One of my personal favorite Sega titles was Vectorman 2 for the Genesis. And what really killed the Dreamcast was the PS2. PS2 had a DVD drive, which the Dreamcast lacked. This "feature-lack" caused the Dreamcast's demand to drop and ultimately, production stopped.

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

SEGA is still better

So, hard proof that Nintendo is superior isn't enough for you to accept it?

Its not hard proof. SEGA is underappreciated.

So a companies income has nothing to do with success? I disaggre.

Nokomis wrote:hey guys,
OPINIONS
so it doesn't matter which is better,
its just OPINIONS
i agree with nelon
but its still an opinion

lol
losers

^.^ Thanks for the support, but you are the one who is a loser.

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:

Nelon wrote:

Xys' Tel Unaki wrote:Making consoles has nothing to do with being a great company.

The dreamcast was the last system they made before becoming strictly software developers. It didnt do so well because it was too far ahead of the times and the technology to develop games for it wasnt around or it wasnt used even if companies had access.

SEGA is, hands down THE single greatest classic name you will ever see.

Sega's highest selling game was Sonic the Hedgehog 2, with 6 million copies sold. However, the NES sold 40.23 million copies of Super Mario Brothers, making it the best selling platform game of all times. I don't think Sega's numbers can come close to comparing with those of Nintendos.

SEGA is still better

So, hard proof that Nintendo is superior isn't enough for you to accept it?

Its not hard proof. SEGA is underappreciated.

So a companies income has nothing to do with success? I disaggre.

I never said they had to be successful.

You can be the best and not be around...Like the Atari

Or the Odyssey. http://www.gametrailers.com/video/angry-video-screwattack/48329

I like the Odyssey gun, ha ha.

Statisticaly speaking, nintendo did win. It also had many more remembered titles. If you ask people to list old games, they are much more likely to use nes and snes games. Does that mean their better? Not necessarily, but (Unaki), don't be such a prick when you state your opinions.

Speaking of sega though, all sonic fans should check this out. It is awesome

Leinad wrote:Statisticaly speaking, nintendo did win. It also had many more remembered titles. If you ask people to list old games, they are much more likely to use nes and snes games. Does that mean their better? Not necessarily, but (Unaki), don't be such a prick when you state your opinions.

Speaking of sega though, all sonic fans should check this out. It is awesome

very nice